Skip to main content
Clairo

🛠️ Doing it yourself

Claiming yourself, or handing it to someone

People arrive at a page like this having already decided the question is which company to use. There is a prior question: whether to use one at all. Both routes are legitimate, they suit different situations, and the trade-off between them is about work and risk rather than about the strength of the claim. This page describes the two models. It does not quote anyone's prices, because a price we copied down today is a price that could be wrong tomorrow.

Check whether there is a claim first →

The two models

Self-service. You establish the facts, submit to the airline, and escalate to the airline's dispute-resolution scheme if the answer does not stand up. Tools like Clairo's checker or a claim letter sit alongside you: they help you prepare, and the claim stays yours. Nothing is deducted from a payout because nobody else is in the transaction.

Representation. You sign the claim over to a service, which assesses it, files it, chases it and escalates it, and takes an agreed fee from whatever it recovers. You do very little after the sign-up form. The typical arrangement charges nothing if nothing is recovered, which shifts the effort and the downside risk onto the provider.

Which is the sensible choice depends on the case, not on a general rule. A single-passenger delay with a clear arrival time and an airline that answers its post is a different proposition from a multi-passenger booking, a disputed cause, an airline that has already refused twice, or a claim you would otherwise abandon.

What the regulator says about the choice

The CAA addresses this directly on its ADR page, and it is worth reading in its own words rather than in anyone's summary. The points it makes:

  • • ADR is free for consumers and the schemes are designed to be simple to use. You do not need a third-party claims management company to take a complaint to ADR.
  • • A claims management company may refer your complaint to the same approved provider, using the same services and processes you can access yourself.
  • • You are entitled to ask a company to take up your complaint — but if the provider awards a payment, the company may deduct a significant proportion of it as its fee.
  • • Both approved schemes have processes for reasonable adjustments, so needing help with the process is not by itself a reason to go through a company.

Separately, on its page about claiming, the CAA notes that not every airline will deal with a complaint submitted through a service such as a claims management company, because some have terms requiring passengers to submit directly and allowing the airline to respond to them before third parties are engaged. That is a practical reason to check the airline's conditions before signing anything.

What the self-service route looks like end to end

  1. 1. Establish the facts. Departure and final destination, actual arrival time at that destination, booking reference, and whatever the airline sent you about the disruption. This is the only stage that needs your memory rather than a form.
  2. 2. Claim to the airline. Use its own form where it has one. The CAA publishes tips and a template for this stage. Expenses and compensation are often separate submissions.
  3. 3. Read the refusal properly. If it cites extraordinary circumstances, the airline should say what the event was. A refusal naming no event is the one most worth pushing back on.
  4. 4. Escalate. To the airline's approved ADR scheme once you have a final response or eight weeks have passed; to the CAA's own complaints team if the airline belongs to no scheme. The CAA lists which airlines sit where.
  5. 5. Court, if it comes to that. The CAA points to the GOV.UK small claims service and suggests exhausting the earlier steps first.

Deadlines apply at stages two and four and they are not the same — see the UK time limits.

Questions to put to any provider

If you do decide on representation, these are the terms that determine what you actually end up with. Verify each one against the provider's current fee schedule and terms of business on its own website — that is the only place they are authoritative, and they change.

  • • How the fee is calculated, and whether tax or a handling charge is added on top.
  • • What is owed if the claim recovers nothing.
  • • Whether a different rate applies once a claim goes to court.
  • • Who receives the money from the airline, and how long before it reaches you.
  • • What happens if the airline pays you directly after you have signed.
  • • Whether you can withdraw, and on what terms.
  • • Whether the airline you are claiming against accepts third-party submissions at all.

Where Clairo sits, plainly

Clairo is on the self-service side. It runs a free eligibility check and can prepare a claim letter you send yourself. It does not file claims, does not correspond with airlines, does not escalate to ADR or to court, and takes nothing out of a payout — because it never touches one. That is a real limitation, not only a virtue: nobody is chasing the airline on your behalf.

Clairo's checker quotes euro estimates and applies an intra-Community-style cap that treats UK airports as inside that area. The UK text of Article 7(1) does not use that wording, so on a long UK–EU route the estimate and the legislation can point at different bands. Treat the checker as a screening step, read the article for yourself, and check the sterling figure the CAA publishes for your route.

UK261 sets its own figures in sterling, so UK sterling amounts are set separately from the euro bands and the two regimes are not interchangeable. Clairo's checker currently shows euro estimates only — check current UK CAA guidance for the sterling figures that apply.

Clairo is not affiliated with, endorsed by or acting for AirHelp or any other claims service. Names of other services are used here only to describe the category of provider people are comparing. Any statement about a particular provider's fees or terms should come from that provider.

Know the claim before you choose how to run it

The decision is easier once you know what kind of claim you have. Read the guide for your disruption first: a delayed flight, a cancellation, a missed connection, or being denied boarding. For the legal framework behind all of them, the UK261 guide sets out the articles.

Do I need a claims company to get flight compensation?

No. The CAA states that Alternative Dispute Resolution is free for consumers, that the schemes are designed to be simple to use, and that you do not need a third-party claims management company to take your complaint to ADR. It also notes that a company doing this refers the complaint to the same approved provider, using the same services and processes you are entitled to access yourself.

What does a representation service actually change?

It changes who does the work and who carries the admin, not what the underlying rules say. The service assesses the claim, submits it, handles correspondence and escalation, and in exchange takes a fee out of anything recovered. The distance bands, the extraordinary-circumstances defence and the evidence the airline can produce are the same either way.

What should I check before signing up to any provider?

Verify the current fee, how it is calculated, what happens if the claim fails, whether VAT or a payment-handling charge is added, whether you can withdraw, and what happens if the airline pays you directly after you have signed. Read those terms on the provider's own website, because they are the only authoritative statement of them and they change. Clairo does not publish other providers' pricing.

Is there a downside to using a claims company?

The CAA raises two points worth knowing. It says that if the ADR provider awards a payment, a claims management company may deduct a significant proportion of it as its fee. It also warns that not all airlines will deal with a complaint submitted through a third party, because some have terms requiring passengers to claim directly and give the airline a chance to respond before involving anyone else.

How much work is doing it myself, honestly?

For a straightforward delay: one form to the airline with your booking details and arrival time, then a wait. If it is refused and you disagree, one more submission to the ADR scheme with the same documents attached. The CAA publishes a template letter and a page of tips for the first stage. The effort is mostly in gathering documents and in not letting the claim go quiet, rather than in anything legal.

Primary sources

Every statement above about the official process comes from these pages. Statements about any commercial provider should come from that provider.

Start with the estimate

There is no point choosing a route until you know whether the flight is in scope at all.

Check my flight →

Airline guides:

Clairo publishes general information and an automated eligibility estimate. It is not legal advice, it does not decide claims, and it cannot tell you what caused your disruption. For a disputed or high-value claim, consider independent legal advice.